Sport Fishing Costa Rica Forum Automated Translation
I agree with Cavero in which this is something that there is to analyze
with too much calm, by the implications that could have then after all
this is a COMPETITION and as so we must be very careful in maintaining a
neutral balance in the same one.
Similarly that is most valuable all the commentaries and suggestions
_________________
Been born to fish, very unfortunately forced to work…
----------------------------
It is important to think that it is not necessary to do it everything of
a single shot, the initiative of tarpon is a good beginning, acuerdence
that the impact is not single that we have directly if not the example
that we put, who it clears and that helps us to have the cover of the
means that we needed so that the sport arises.
Danilo
-------------------------------
I mention the law that this slope in the legislative assembly.
ARTICLE 76. -
They declare the fish guards (Istiophorus albidius), marlin blue (Makaira
nigrioans), marlin black (Makaira indicates),
marlin rallado (audacious Tetrapturas) and tarpon (Melaops atlanticus),
like species of tourist-sport interest.
By no place depés of it to me to have leido of edge to I crack, says
that prote'ge's estan. (That badly)
But it speaks of the prohibitions, and if the Minae publishes in
prohibition any species this is left prote'ge'e.
------------------------------
EXCELLENT DATA PECHECHE! It will be necessary to discuss it with much
calm in the Board of directors. And sure so that no, to consult to LUIS
or GERALD to him!
Another thing.
Publish the Law that already step the first debate and this to the delay.
in this same forum.
It paints of colors the aspects to them that I think that they are
important for us and…. they have not leido nor scab?
jajajaj is like spending powder in buzzards, that if God wants is going
to be the law that governs the sport fishing of our country. Read It
fishing - Mozotes
---------------------
as far as which it express the law, at local level there are no
restrictions. Rather one has occurred at world-wide level with the
foundation of the fish guards (www.billfish.org)
that as foundation promotes the liberation of these fish. But really
there is no law that regulates them. Of it is here where podriamos to
take like example, and to begin promoting the conservation of this
species, later podriamos to think about others. I believe that doing
this, they perhaps give but importance us to other levels.
-----------------------
I must confess that I do not have the official source by hand, but, I
have understood that the one that a species is declared “Of Tourist-Sport
interest” means that it cannot be sacrificed in its fishing and under no
circumstance it is possible to be fished commercially, nor to operate
its meat and/or derivatives. Bony, it is captured and it is freed. I
will try to support this definition of official way. But meanwhile, I do
not know You but, to my would give to pity or verguenza rather me, to
take a photo me with 125Lbs from meat of bad quality, sacrificed single
to satisfy my ego, my very human instinct to kill. The problem is that
in a competition to probably it would hold those feelings me and would
take the fish to the Roman. It is why the one must be the Club that
causes the liberation of the pieces.
On the other hand, we do not return to the times those where it was
presumed that ALL in the club we are corrupt ones, and démosnos the
first confidence. I insist surely on which I consider the control method
proposed, enough.
Sincerely, what takes control of tarpon of X Lbs of weight? Except for
sancocho of the devils, with red meat, bloody and bad oliente. I insist,
here nobody fishing by hunger, and if, he is rich to be pleasant one
from time to time but for that they are the snooks, snappers, corvinas
and other species.
LET US GIVE THE EXAMPLE, BY GOD! That is the point. What case are
going to us to lend the villagers when we speak to them of conservation
if they have always seen us arrive and massacre 30, 40 crushers in
Guatuzo, or Leave with N jureles beaches or in this case, that a “Lucky
person” and fishing matador ours exhibit sábalo enormous, chorreando
blood and that probably are going to let that way to wire drawing
because “What perza pelar that tiny beast” (and I have seen more than
one to do it). Common sense? Clear! the common sense says to me that we
must do the possible thing to release the greater amount of fish than we
pruned. And they know what? By experience I say to them that it gets it
to respect to one, a villager who sees release it a good piece.
_________________
Ing. Ronny Ross S.
---------------------------------
We are speaking of the fishing in the sea, or of the continental
fishing?
I return and I repeat.
I am in favor of the liberation mainly in the continental fishing, that
but is affected in our matches (minimum Guatuzo = 100 crushers).
Guapote? almost nor it already has. This if it is a problem that there
is to analyze.
But I see the criteria dividos as far as the liberation in the sea.
Fortunate those that saw remove Sábalos in bulk, in 5 years single I
have seen the capture of 1, and before that some they remember the one
of Felipe. Roosters? talvez about a 1 or 2 to the year, the these meats
of equal of ugly. Sincerely I do not believe that we do damage to him to
anybody with two gallitos and a sabalito every 3 years, in the fishing
some times must have sacrifices.
Then we are in favor of killing everything what he is pleasant to our
paladar but… that if we release what knows ugly! That is the
conservation sense that we have? The convenience?
The example that we showed it we can see from different points of view,
giving back the small pieces, not using networks, seeding the species
that but we struck and although not paresca it, flattering the fish that
we did not consume the villagers.
Common, clear sense! We are in a club which awards with trophy and gold
ring to which it takes but died fish to the Roman. Trophy to which it
kills but kilos by species, Trophy to the equipment that accumulates
more points to kill and to weigh. This is the organization in that we
are put, now does not occur with a stone in the chest and cries on the
fish fallen in battle.
I suggest the liberation conscientiously, we do not have to hope to
that a species this on the way to extinction to protect it. In the Board
of directors we have reduced the number of pieces in some places, and I
am sure that if we must lower but we do it.
On the other hand, it is easier not to allow in the club the fishing of
Sábalos within his statutes as well as some other species estan. Thus
nobody can allege nothing.
I continue mentioning the law that this slope of approval
ARTICLE 74. -
The captures obtained of the sport fishing, according to the authorized
amount of unit, will be destined to
taxidermia or the consumption of those who makes them, under the terms
and the conditions that the INCOPESCA determines. |
